A Comparative Study of Plagiarism Detection Practices Among Library and Information Science Professionals and Non-Library and Information Science Professionals: Implications for Academic Integrity

Abstract

Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) focus on ethical research practices among academic professionals, including students and research scholars. Despite the burgeoning availability and utilisation of plagiarism detection software (PDS) in higher education institutions in India, there is a dearth of empirical evidence on how plagiarism-detection practices vary between LIS professionals and non-LIS professionals. The problem this study seeks to address, therefore, is the inadequate understanding of the similarities and differences in plagiarism-detection practices between LIS and non-LIS professionals in India, and the implications of these practices for academic integrity. The study examines how Library and Information Science (LIS) professionals and non-Library and Information Science (non-LIS) professionals in India, utilise and perceive plagiarism detection technologies. The goals were to examine the frequency and prevalence of using plagiarism detection software use, investigate the factors that influence their adoption, evaluate its perceived correctness, dependability, and efficacy, and compare the views of LIS and non-LIS professionals on the software.  A structured questionnaire was used to collect data, using a mixed-methods approach. The findings show that there is no discernible difference in the attitudes or usage habits of LIS professionals and non-LIS professionals regarding their awareness of plagiarism detection software. Also, plagiarism detection software is gaining trust in upholding academic integrity. Reinforcement of academic ethics awareness programmes, frequent training on the use of these tools effectively, and ensuring that academicians have access to reliable plagiarism detection software.

Keywords: ,,